Normative Analysis of Criminal Penalty Reduction of The Pinangki Prosecutor by The Judge of The DKI Jakarta High Court

Abstract

Pinangki Sirna Malasari is a Prosecutor who serves at the Attorney General's Office of the Republic of Indonesia who now has to languish in prison because the Prosecutor Pinangki has committed several criminal acts, which in legal theory are categorized as concurrent/combined criminal acts (Samenloop). In the process and course of his sentence, it creates problems from the public's perspective with what has been determined by the judge at the DKI Jakarta High Court. This is because Prosecutor Pinangki, who was originally at the Central Jakarta District Court, was sentenced to prison for 10 (ten) years, but after the defendant, Prosecutor Pinangki filed an appeal to the DKI Jakarta High Court, resulting in a reduced verdict and lightening the defendant, Prosecutor Pinangki. a sentence of 4 (four) years in prison. This is certainly interesting for the author to study, because there are so many responses stating that the law in Indonesia is so unfair. Apart from that, after there was a lot of discussion about the case, it certainly had an impact and influence on the community which resulted in the community also speaking up about the case. So that in this work the author conducts an analysis of the existing legal scientific theory with the practice of implementing law in the field.